School of Architecture and Design \ Interior Architecture and Environmental Design
Course Credit
ECTS Credit
Course Type
Instructional Language
Programs that can take the course
Interior Architecture and Environmental Design Bachelor's Degree Program
The Basic Design course, using deductive and inductive methods, involves two- and three-dimensional abstract and concrete form-making studies in parallel with design elements, design principles, and perception theories. It conducts studies focusing on the aesthetic and functional aspects of space.
Textbook and / or References
"Abbott, E. A. (2016). Düzdünya. (Ş. Çetin, Çev.) İstanbul: Sola Unitas.
Arnheim, R. (2009). Görsel Düşünme. İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
Atalayer, F. (1994). Temel Sanat Öğeleri. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları
Berger, J. (2010). Görme Biçimleri. İstanbul: Metis Yayınevi.
Bielefeld, B., & El Khouili, S. (2010). Adım Adım Tasarım Fikirleri. İstanbul: Yapı Endüstri Merkezi
Brooker, G., & Stone, S. (2011). İç Mekan Tasarımı Nedir? İstanbul: Yapı Endüstri Merkezi.
Cemal, A. (2015). Sanat Üzerine Denemeler. İstanbul: Can Sanat Yayınları.
Ching, F. D. (2004). Iç Mekan Tasarımı. İstanbul: Yapı Endüstri Merkezi.
Ching, F. D. (2010). Mimarlık, Biçim, Mekan ve Düzen. İstanbul: Yapı Endüstri Merkezi.
Çakmakçı, O. (2015). Konuşmanın İmkansızlığı Üzerine Bir Diyalog. İstanbul: İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
Eroğlu, Ö., & Yurdun, Ö. A. (2017). KANDINSKY Nokta ve Çizgiden Yüzeye. İstanbul: Tekhne
Gagg, R. (2012). İç Mimarlık Temelleri 05: İç Mmarlıkta doku + malzeme. İstanbul: 2013
Heskett, J. (2017). Tasarım. Ankara: Dost Kitabevi.
Itten, J. (1975). Design and Form: The Basic Course at the Bauhaus and Later. Stuttgart: John Wiley & Sons
Onat, E. (1995). Mimarlık, Form ve Geometri. İstanbul: Yapı Endüstri Merkezi."
The aim of the course is to enable students to generate design knowledge; to experience the processes of (abstract) concept formation and (concrete) comprehension in design, thereby developing their form-giving skills.
1. Develops the ability to access, generate, and communicate knowledge that can contribute to forming a design culture related to the given problem and proposed solutions.
2. Enhances skills in 2D, 3D, and 4D presentation.
3. Cultivates sensitivity to aesthetic values such as light, color, and texture.
4. Gains awareness of technical practices related to the fields of vision, hearing, and touch.
5. Develops construction knowledge skills in the areas of structure, material, and detailing.
Week 1: Introduction to course content, methods, and workflow, Defining the expected knowledge transfer from İÇT121 Basic Design I, In-Class Exercise #1 – Establishing a common language among relief studies
Week 2: Group Critique #1 – Model alternatives & 3D relationship types, Group Critique #2 – Model alternatives & 3D relationship types
Week 3: Group Critique #3 – Model alternatives & 3D relationship types – Opacity/Transparency, Group Critique #4 – Model alternatives & 3D relationship types – Opacity/Transparency
Week 4: Seminar #1 – On Light and Color, In-Class Exercise #2 – "The Weight of Shadow" in Photography Booths, In-Class Exercise #3 – "The Color of Shadow" in Photography Booths
Week 5: Seminar #2 – On Form Language and Archetypes, In-Class Exercise #4 – Defining "language" through relief values and models, Group Critique #5 – Model alternatives & 3D relationship types – Key Module/Unit
Week 6: Group Critique #6 – Model alternatives & 3D relationship types – Key Module/Unit, Midterm Jury
Week 7: Seminar #3 – "Action Spaces and Relationships" In-Class Exercise #5 – Action-Space Studies, In-Class Exercise #6 – Action-Body Studies
Week 8: Group Critique #7 – Space alternatives, Group Critique #8 – Space alternatives
Week 9: Group Critique #9 – Space alternatives, Group Critique #10 – Space alternatives
Week 10: Group Critique #11 – Space alternatives, Group Critique #12 – Space alternatives
Week 11: Group Critique #13 – Space alternatives, Pre-Jury
Week 12: Group Critique #14 – On presentation strategies, Group Critique #15 – On presentation strategies
Tentative Assesment Methods
• Midterm Exam 30 %
• Final Exam 40 %
• Performance 10 %
• Participation 20 %
|
Program Outcome
**
|
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
|
Course Outcome
|
|---|
| 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|