School of Architecture and Design \ Interior Architecture and Environmental Design
Course Credit
ECTS Credit
Course Type
Instructional Language
Programs that can take the course
The course is grounded in the concepts of IMAGE and MEMORY, proposing a perspective that examines the city through the lens of individual, societal, and collective behavior, moving from the urban scale to architecture, and from architecture to interior space. Within this framework, the course focuses on three different museums located in three distinct cities. The selection of these spaces is based on: The traceability and readability of their historical continuity, The demonstrable relationship between renovation approaches and their contextual integration.
Textbook and / or References
Aytaç, Ö. (2017). Kent, Metropol ve Değişen Yer/Mekan İmajları. Mukaddime, 8(1), 1-23.
Baudrillard, J. (2022). Simülakrlar ve Simülasyon. (O. Adanır, Çev.) İstanbul: Doğu Batı Yayınları.
Bobaroğlu, M. (2022, 09 17). Simge Kavramı ve Simgesel Düşünme. 09 23, 2022 tarihinde YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IDv3zqlS-N0&t=44s adresinden alındı
Eraydın, Z. (2016). Kentsel Markalaşma Stratejilerinin Kent Belleği ve Kent İmgesi Üzerine Etkileri: Ankara Örneği. İdeal Kent, 7(20), 830-855.
Gehl, J. (2011). Life Between Buildings, Using Public Space. Washington, ABD: Island Press.
Hodder, I., & Hutson, S. (2010). Geçmişi Okumak, Arkeolojiyi Yorumlamada Güncel Yaklaşımlar. (B. Toprak, & E. Rona, Çev.) Ankara: Phoenix Yayınevi.
Köksal, A. (2021). Bu Mekan Artık Bu Yer Değil. G. Özaydın, & M. Akı içinde, Mekan ve Yer (s. 10-19). İstanbul: Yeni İnsan Yayınevi.
Lynch, K. (2021). Kent İmgesi. (İ. Başaran, Çev.) İstanbul, Türkiye: İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
The primary aim of the course is to enable students to evaluate an interior design problem through contemporary examples. Key requirements of the course include:
Analyzing the needs of a function alongside the spatial data,
Providing conceptual evaluations based on these analyses,
Assessing the spatial formation of contemporary interiors within a socio-cultural context.
1. Develops an aesthetic understanding related to spatial analysis.
2. Cultivates a critical aesthetic perspective in spatial interpretation.
3. Fosters a creative aesthetic vision in spatial production.
4. Enhances awareness of technical requirements for improving communication and expression skills.
Week 1: Introduction to the Course – Overview of content and methodology. Discussion on Image and Symbol.
Week 2: Seminar #1: On Space and Place.
Week 3: Seminar #2: On Individual and Memory.
Week 4: Seminar #3: On Society and Collective Memory.
Week 5: Technical Trip #1: Ankara – Museum of Anatolian Civilizations, Kale, Altındağ
Week 6: Student Readings #1: Memory!
Week 7: Technical Trip #2: Ankara – Temple of Augustus, Hacı Bayram, Altındağ
Week 8: Student Readings #2: Place!
Week 9: Student Presentations.
Week 10: Technical Trip #3: Patara Ancient City, Kaş/Antalya
Week 11: Student Readings #3a.
Week 12: Student Readings #3b.
Tentative Assesment Methods
• Assignment 1 20 %
• Assignment 2 20 %
• Assignment 3 20 %
• Participation 20 %
• Project 20 %
|
Program Outcome
*
|
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
|
Course Outcome
|
|---|
| 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|